Which is faster and better for caching, File System cache or Redis or Memcached?
- Thread starter Mihai B.
- Start date
- file system cache memcached redis
Localnode
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2015
- Messages
- 333
- Points
- 43
Redis is generally faster.
You can read this for some more information.
You can read this for some more information.
Veesp
Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2017
- Messages
- 47
- Points
- 8
Hi, @Mihai B.! Sometimes, especially for dynamic DB-driven websites, it's obviously good to use Memcached. Keep in mind that Memcached is a back-end caching server. There is also Varnish which is, probably, more popular web caching server and it is a front-end one. Varnish has a lot of configuration options. Then while comparing Memcached which limits key names to 250 bytes and works with plain strings only with Redis which allows key names and values to be as large as 512MB each, I suppose, Redis will be the most universal fitting for speeding-up your websites. Check it out, I hope it will the best solution in your case!
bountysite
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2017
- Messages
- 109
- Points
- 28
Redis supports more data types than just simple key value as in memcache.
But talking about file system cache, you are talking varnish, which is built specifically for this.
You can also use tmpfs, to store data directly in volatile memory, for performance. But the downfall of having to put data on every reboot.
But talking about file system cache, you are talking varnish, which is built specifically for this.
You can also use tmpfs, to store data directly in volatile memory, for performance. But the downfall of having to put data on every reboot.
Localnode
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2015
- Messages
- 333
- Points
- 43
Personally, I'll amend my former post with this:
Redis and PHP_FPM.
I've not tested others, but having Redis and PHP_FPM setup managed to get my test development to under 1 second from certain places.
YMMV, for me it works a treat. Others will have their own opinion.
LSCache, Redis, Opcache, Memcached, PHP_FPM. Redis is usually around the same popularity as LSCache. Others say Varnish.
Then you get into the whole web server thing, NGINX, Apache, Litespeed.
What kind of website are you talking about caching? Is it a static website? Wordpress? Drupal? Any sort of CMS?
Redis and PHP_FPM.
I've not tested others, but having Redis and PHP_FPM setup managed to get my test development to under 1 second from certain places.
YMMV, for me it works a treat. Others will have their own opinion.
LSCache, Redis, Opcache, Memcached, PHP_FPM. Redis is usually around the same popularity as LSCache. Others say Varnish.
Then you get into the whole web server thing, NGINX, Apache, Litespeed.
What kind of website are you talking about caching? Is it a static website? Wordpress? Drupal? Any sort of CMS?
Older Threads
Newer Threads
- Redirect
N/A
Latest Threads
Recommended Threads
Similar Threads
Latest postsNew threads
-
New threads
-
How much bandwidth is enough for a growing website?
- Started by Ridoy
- Replies: 1
-
-
What are the performance differences between DNS load Balancing and reverse proxy?
- Started by jtti
- Replies: 2
-
Latest Hosting OffersNew Reviews
-
Latest hosting offers
-
Save an incredible 90% off! The Best HostPapa Deal so Far: Unlimited SSL, 50 GB NVMe, 24/7 supportEssentials Hosting provides reliable and affordable web hosting solutions!- cancan
- Updated:
-
Affordable Dedicated Servers - Raspberry Pi & Intel N95 | From €12.90/mo - Unlimited Traffic.Affordable Raspberry Pi & Intel N95 Dedicated Servers with SSD Storage and Unlimited Traffic.- Tinyservers.eu
- Updated:
-
SystemInPlace - Low cost Dual E5 384GB/512GB RAM DEDI. 30% OFF FIRST MONTH! 1gb/2.5gb/5gb/10gbAffordable enterprise grade dedicated servers at a price you can afford.- systeminplace
- Updated:
-
