I didn't agree a bit on this point because web hosts didn't use a hosting control panel not mean it will be more secured, optimized or even more RAM to Wordpress, more hosting control panels are using caching systems on their system which supported better than no control panel and it also offered more security features than others.
Good question.
Everything breaks down to resource usage...and when more elements are added or used, those are more elements that need to be secured, and that will use RAM.
Let's look over a few basic examples of a moderate WordPress website on two hosts;
Host A
- cPanel
- Centos
- Apache (or litespeed and maybe CloudLinux)
- MySQL
- 2 GB VPS
- WordPress
- WooCommerce
With host A, cPanel needs to be secured. cPanel uses 1GB of RAM, leaving the user with 1GB. Then add WooCommerce which requires 512MB...the user is now left with 512MB for MySQL and everything needed to run. With a cpanel account, it's also running DNS, other services not needed for WordPress, and Emails...which if you have SpamAssassin installed, your RAM is cut down some more. Run all of this on Apache, and there will be usage issues, which many run into everyday.
Also, do this on a Shared host, and the ability to customize the account to the users needs is not possible since all the resources are Shared.
Host B
- No control panel
- Ubuntu or Debian
- Nginx
- Percona or MariaDB
- 2 GB VPS
- WordPress
- WooCommerce
With host B, no resources are lost to a control panel, so RAM is still 2GB...and with no panel being installed, the system is not limited to Centos. Ubuntu and Debian have proven in many real world to do a better job than Centos. Now with panels....there are other panels that can be used, and ones that are not limited to Centos...but if it's not needed, then no reason to install it.
WordPress only needs to two things...PHP and MySQL. An account running a panel, emails, DNS and other elements is just wasted resources.
With PHP, one can use Nginx. Does a better job than Apache, and has a built in Cache. MySQL..Maria or Percona are better options.
Without getting into fine details about each element, overall the usage is far less, while the account can handle a great amount of connections without running out of Memory.
I don't think there is a real Wordpress web hosting unless you tell me all features that it can bring to us than a normal web host.
Wordpress hosting is a marketing term to sell it in a different way with soome addon features
the list you have said doesn't take much time at all to perform and for that why pay extra amount
Now to address "real" WordPress hosting...it breaks down into two types of web hosts; Web Host A and Web Host B (as above).
Web Host A markets WordPress hosting for SEO purposes. The account is a general account that one could but with any reputable web host. Good for a new WordPress website, or with low to medium traffic. Many of such hosts will sell all forms of unlimited hosting with various packages that accommodate everything. Security and caching is left up to the owner of the website.
Web Host B markets WordPress hosting because that is all they supply. Caching and security is done from the server, and not from a plugin. Once those jobs are left to a plugin, it's already a few steps too late. A regular attack stopped by a plugin is processed by PHP and MySQL. An attack stopped from the server never reaches PHP or MySQL, thus less resource usage, less plugin usage, and the account works as it should with no interruptions.
When a user as the needs as the OP or others that have careers where they cannot sit and manage their website 24 hours a day...a Managed Web host will do the job for them. While they focus on either managing content or their careers, the host will take care of updates, security, speed, and everything else that keep WordPress working efficiently. One can do it their self, but many times they run into situations where they need help. With that, they spend hours and days on forums or with support trying to get help or trying to learn something they never knew. Not only does that waste time and money, it leaves their website open to many issues.
The problem...too many web hosts jumped on being a Host A and confused people. Some of the larger hosts were never a Host A...they were just a web host...some reputable, some ???. People would pay for accounts at Host A expecting something different, to find out it was just marketing, and end up leaving. Some find a Host B and stay with them for years and grow with them while others jump from host to host to host looking for better. A classic example, hosts who are owned by EIG. The thousands of users that leave one brand (say HG) and go to another (say BlueHost) not realizing it's the same company, just a different brand...and with each one, they marketed to WordPress users in an attempt to recapture that market. GoDaddy's WP hosting....the countless complaints I have read about it not being any different than their regular hosting, and sadly it's true (from tests done).