Web Hosting Forum Login
Not a member yet? Sign up

Vultr vs. OVH vs. Ramnode vs. Linode vs. Digitalocean?

  • FORUMS
  • WEB DESIGN
  • WEB HOSTING OFFERS
  • ADVERTISING
  • WEB HOSTING
  • REQUEST A HOST
  • BEST WEB HOSTING
  • QUICK MENU
  • REGISTER HERE - Join us for FREE
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 37
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    102
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 10/0
    Given: 163/0

    Vultr vs. OVH vs. Ramnode vs. Linode vs. Digitalocean?

    I heard of these VPS hosting companies but not tried all their services.

    Vultr, OVH, Ramnode, Linode and Digitalocean? which one can give you best price, specs...for a strong VPS?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,267
    Thanks
    68
    Thanked 283 Times in 226 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 654/1
    Given: 261/0
    Vultr - Not bad, not to expensive, cool features but oriented more for dev than hosting with pay per hour
    OVH - YES YES and YES - 3$ for a VPS which can run a faster web server if you don't use a control panel (yes I know, I hope you love SSH )
    Ramnode - No experience myself, but i'm currently moving a customer from their vps offer because it's how to say that. Too expensive and really slow. But I don't know what are their other offer, anyway for me it's not the best
    Linode - Better than Vultr in perf, but cost most
    DigitalOcean - Like linode, good level of service, but expensive

    You have not list the all new in the hosting war : Scaleway : 3$ for 2core 2GB RAM and 50GB SSD. Up to 800mbps unmetered. Better network than ovh, less powerful cpu. But a good choice anymore. with some baremetal (small dedicated) from 12$ with 8GB RAM and up to 2.5GB network

    Name:  133238qvq.jpg
Views: 4053
Size:  14.9 KB

    So I will recommand you OVH in production, really reliable hosting, 3x less expensive than others. And to make some test try scaleway as you can pay per hour any server. Even the bigger which cost 25$ for 32GB RAM. They haven't a big cpu but fast enough to run what you want

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    598
    Thanks
    550
    Thanked 263 Times in 129 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 197/0
    Given: 1,088/0
    Quote Originally Posted by VirtuBox View Post
    Vultr - Not bad, not to expensive, cool features but oriented more for dev than hosting with pay per hour
    Right, I am having one VPS with Vultr, everything just fine but just a thing, 1 or 2 months your VPS can be downed that you don't know the reason, you have to restart the VPS and it works as well back. Maybe by their network.

    Quote Originally Posted by VirtuBox View Post
    OVH - YES YES and YES - 3$ for a VPS which can run a faster web server if you don't use a control panel (yes I know, I hope you love SSH )
    Why it runs faster when don't use a hosting control panel?

    Quote Originally Posted by VirtuBox View Post

    Ramnode - No experience myself, but i'm currently moving a customer from their vps offer because it's how to say that. Too expensive and really slow. But I don't know what are their other offer, anyway for me it's not the best
    I used, its pretty good but expensive and you have to use KVM SSD and this type of VPS is pretty expensive if you don't have a good budget.
    Quote Originally Posted by VirtuBox View Post

    Linode - Better than Vultr in perf, but cost most
    I have not used Linode before.
    Better than Vultr? what features?

    Quote Originally Posted by VirtuBox View Post
    DigitalOcean - Like linode, good level of service, but expensive
    I don't know but DigitalOcean loaded pretty slow for me at 2GB Memory, 2 Core Processor.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,267
    Thanks
    68
    Thanked 283 Times in 226 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 654/1
    Given: 261/0
    Quote Originally Posted by fwh View Post
    Right, I am having one VPS with Vultr, everything just fine but just a thing, 1 or 2 months your VPS can be downed that you don't know the reason, you have to restart the VPS and it works as well back. Maybe by their network.
    Vultr have less one click-apps available, and with exactly the same price than digitalOcean. For me that's too expensive for web hosting, because you will not use hourly billing.

    Why it runs faster when don't use a hosting control panel?
    Because a control panel try to have the less impact on websites performances, not to be the fastest hosting solution. Using a light web server (LAMP or LEMP) you will always have better performances than a control panel. But to manage several websites, it could be hard sometimes, and for security, you have to know what you are doing.
    For WordPress websites, some tools like easyengine or centminmod make the command line easy to use, even for several websites. One of my VPS handle 35k visitors daily with 4GB RAM and the load average is under 5%.

    I have not used Linode before.
    Better than Vultr? what features?
    Linode is two times less expensive, for similar or better performances (from some benchmarks I have run on the 3 providers).


    I don't know but DigitalOcean loaded pretty slow for me at 2GB Memory, 2 Core Processor.
    No issue with DigitalOcean but like Vultr, expensive for web hosting.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    116
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 3/0
    Given: 168/0
    Quote Originally Posted by VirtuBox View Post
    Vultr have less one click-apps available, and with exactly the same price than digitalOcean. For me that's too expensive for web hosting, because you will not use hourly billing.
    What click-apps are you talking about?

    Quote Originally Posted by VirtuBox View Post
    One of my VPS handle 35k visitors daily with 4GB RAM and the load average is under 5%.
    If so you could need to optimize your VPS more on configurations. I could think to 50% or higher load average for this case.

    Quote Originally Posted by VirtuBox View Post
    Linode is two times less expensive, for similar or better performances (from some benchmarks I have run on the 3 providers).
    No issue with DigitalOcean but like Vultr, expensive for web hosting.
    yeah you are right, I checked both providers and Linode is really cheaper but not sure it can be better.

    Linode pricing
    Name:  Linode-pricing.png
Views: 3944
Size:  68.1 KB

    Vultr pricing
    Name:  vultr-pricing.jpg
Views: 3781
Size:  39.2 KB

    While we only pay $20 to have 4GB RAM Linode but need to pay $40 to have same configs with Vultr and DigitalOcean. I think its also a factor affect to customers before purchasing a hosting plan.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,267
    Thanks
    68
    Thanked 283 Times in 226 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 654/1
    Given: 261/0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mujkanovic View Post
    What click-apps are you talking about?
    Name:  Screenshot7.jpg
Views: 3810
Size:  63.9 KB

    If so you could need to optimize your VPS more on configurations. I could think to 50% or higher load average for this case.
    That's already an optimized configuration, with a control panel I will probably have higher load average

    Name:  Screenshot8.jpg
Views: 3761
Size:  30.1 KB


    yeah you are right, I checked both providers and Linode is really cheaper but not sure it can be better.
    While we only pay $20 to have 4GB RAM Linode but need to pay $40 to have same configs with Vultr and DigitalOcean. I think its also a factor affect to customers before purchasing a hosting plan.
    You can check my benchmark if you want to compare the performances of Linode, DO & Vultr : https://forumweb.hosting/13131-benchmark-top-hosting-providers-vps-update-07-16.html

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    355
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 147/1
    Given: 99/0
    I prefer OVH and find it evens runs fine with cPanel, too.
    Web Hosting - Professional Hosting Solutions
    Web Hosting Forum - Web Hosting Community

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    235
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 36/0
    Given: 273/0
    Quote Originally Posted by HostXNow View Post
    I prefer OVH and find it evens runs fine with cPanel, too.
    All run fine with cPanel mate!

    I have ever used all these providers, in my point of view, OVH and Digitalocean is better than the rest (Ramnode, Vultr, Linode)

    OVH - slowly support but also because they are unmanaged hosting providers.
    Digitalocean - Load slowly for 1 CPU core, if you want your websites load faster, you need to choose the droplets that having more than 2 CPUs.
    Ramnode - suspend your VPS if you exceed RAM usage without any reports
    Vultr, Linode - when your VPS has any problems, they will email you but if you don't reply them for 24 hours, they can suspend your VPS.

    Just 0.02 my cents!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    545
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 102 Times in 90 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 244/0
    Given: 61/0
    Prices are more or less the same in my opinion, the hardware is also more or less the same, its the support that makes a difference and non of the big companies offer support at the level which they should.
    I personally think Digitalocean does a little better when it comes to the support part.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    78
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 26/1
    Given: 1/0
    I agree, most big companies forget about support which is the biggest push for customers. That's what happens when you get famous and forget how you became famous in the first place!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    60
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 11/1
    Given: 8/3
    Support from vultr also good, i have one with vultr. No have any problem until 7mo previously in ovh. Ovh performance good but some time network slow for my VPS SSD 1, so i moved to vultr.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    367
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 24 Times in 21 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 100/0
    Given: 80/0
    Quote Originally Posted by jwn View Post
    Ovh performance good but some time network slow for my VPS SSD 1
    I've been thinking about trying one of these out from OVH but now I am not sure that I should. How often did you experience the slow period, was it once or multiple times?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    102
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 10/0
    Given: 163/0
    Quote Originally Posted by jwn View Post
    Support from vultr also good, i have one with vultr. No have any problem until 7mo previously in ovh. Ovh performance good but some time network slow for my VPS SSD 1, so i moved to vultr.
    You are right about this, I have same issues with VPS SSD 2 and VPS SSD 3, sometimes it loaded slowly and I can not know why causes that.
    But with VPS SSD 1, you are at lowest and minimum configurations for a VPS at OVH, I am sure you will have this problem happened many times

    If I am not wrong, you are using this plan from OVH.

    VPS SSD 1
    OpenStack KVM
    1 vCore
    2.4 GHz
    2 GB RAM
    10 GB SSD
    Local RAID 10
    If so, you should consider using higher plans, as VPS SSD 3 or VPS CLOUD 3 of OVH which can give you good speed and more stable.

    VPS CLOUD 3
    OpenStack KVM
    99.99% SLA
    4 vCores
    3.1 GHz
    8 GB RAM
    100 GB
    High Availability (Ceph)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gecko View Post
    I've been thinking about trying one of these out from OVH but now I am not sure that I should.
    You should try VPS SSD 3 or VPS CLOUD 3, if you have a decent budget, you can go with a dedicated server.
    Since I asked this question, I tried some in them and had some experience or knew which ones are better.

    I can order their position based on quality/price/specs as follows

    OVH > Vultr > Digitalocean > Linode > Ramnode

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    146
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 33 Times in 19 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 150/0
    Given: 61/0
    Linode for VPS hands down beats all the others for performance + cloud based features like cloning disks and vps and snapshot backups. OVH VPS is the worst as it's disk I/O is very bad and capped.

    Order would be

    1. Linode
    2. Ramnode
    3. DigitalOcean
    4. Vultr
    5. OVH

    I have lots of comparative benchmark reviews for Linode, DigitalOcean, and Vultr and individual OVH Cloud VPS reviews I have done and posted on my own forums. Not sure if I can link to them here ?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    367
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 24 Times in 21 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 100/0
    Given: 80/0
    Quote Originally Posted by wpspeedster View Post
    You should try VPS SSD 3
    This is actually the one that I would like to get because I can use it for several of my sites. I have never tried them before which is why I was considering using their bottom package, just to try out their services. The VPS SSD 3 has some really good specs for the price based on what I have seen in my research so that's more than likely going to be one that I will end up with.

    Thanks for your input and information, I always appreciate good help.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    102
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 10/0
    Given: 163/0
    Quote Originally Posted by eva2000 View Post
    1. Linode
    2. Ramnode
    3. DigitalOcean
    4. Vultr
    5. OVH
    Can you prove it? or it is just your personal opinion?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    146
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 33 Times in 19 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 150/0
    Given: 61/0
    have comparative benchmarks but it's against forum rules to link to them (self promotion) and they're long and detailed

    example of one of dozens of benchmark results this is for disk FFIO benchmarks back in August 2015

    Name:  benchmarks1.jpg
Views: 2716
Size:  42.3 KB

    and OpenSSL - of particular interest is for SSL certificates and HTTPS via RSA 2048bit and ECC 256bit ECDSA

    Name:  benchmarks2.jpg
Views: 2740
Size:  84.7 KB

    OVH Public Cloud EG-7 instance from Jan 2016 benchmarks raw disk FFIO in comparison
    Code:
    -------------------------------------------
    disk FIO tests
    -------------------------------------------
    
    FIO random reads:
    randomreads: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    fio-2.0.9
    Starting 1 process
    randomreads: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 1024MB)
    
    randomreads: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3984: Thu Dec 31 19:49:25 2015
      read : io=1024.3MB, bw=8004.4KB/s, iops=2001 , runt=131033msec
      cpu          : usr=1.82%, sys=6.32%, ctx=246575, majf=0, minf=83
      IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
         submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
         complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
         issued    : total=r=262207/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
       READ: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=8004KB/s, minb=8004KB/s, maxb=8004KB/s, mint=131033msec, maxt=131033msec
    
    Disk stats (read/write):
      vda: ios=262045/73, merge=0/26, ticks=8374297/371, in_queue=8375702, util=100.00%
    
    FIO random writes:
    randomwrites: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    fio-2.0.9
    Starting 1 process
    
    randomwrites: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=4002: Thu Dec 31 19:51:41 2015
      write: io=1024.3MB, bw=7727.4KB/s, iops=1931 , runt=135729msec
      cpu          : usr=1.39%, sys=6.26%, ctx=220032, majf=0, minf=18
      IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
         submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
         complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
         issued    : total=r=0/w=262207/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
      WRITE: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=7727KB/s, minb=7727KB/s, maxb=7727KB/s, mint=135729msec, maxt=135729msec
    
    Disk stats (read/write):
      vda: ios=0/261960, merge=0/0, ticks=0/8649441, in_queue=8650299, util=100.00%
    OpenSSL
    Code:
    -------------------------------------------
    OpenSSL System Benchmark
    -------------------------------------------
    
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    -------------------------------------------
    openssl speed rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc -multi 2
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    built on: Mon Dec 14 05:15:47 UTC 2015
    options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
    md5             119114.20k   346672.32k   764772.86k  1095572.14k  1256876.71k
    sha1            132379.21k   368093.29k   801694.21k  1183186.26k  1474958.68k
    rc4             740271.96k  1300585.32k  1520406.95k  1575287.47k  1582809.09k
    aes-128 cbc     253559.56k   278434.73k   284982.02k   609188.52k   618599.77k
    aes-256 cbc     184280.39k   199743.91k   202872.58k   446723.75k   452149.25k
    sha256          100144.66k   221360.19k   392457.05k   473819.14k   499971.41k
                      sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
    rsa 2048 bits 0.000590s 0.000018s   1695.0  56349.2
    rsa 4096 bits 0.004132s 0.000066s    242.0  15209.3
                                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
    256 bit ecdsa (nistp256)   0.0001s   0.0002s  19419.3   5057.9
    -------------------------------------------
    openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 2
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    built on: Mon Dec 14 05:15:47 UTC 2015
    options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
    evp             957220.09k  1007051.93k  1020813.31k  1024438.27k  1015267.33k
    -------------------------------------------
    openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 2
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    built on: Mon Dec 14 05:15:47 UTC 2015
    options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
    evp            1258757.73k  1356930.77k  1383251.71k  1390031.87k  1394032.64k

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    355
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 147/1
    Given: 99/0
    I think OVH SSD VPS 3 plan is really good. Their SSD VPS range is much better compared to their Cloud VPS. Plus OVH offers far better DDoS protection compared to the others, and so the combo of speed & DDoS protection for value for money would go to OVH, IMO.

    I had a VPS with Vultr with their 10Gbps DDoS protected IP which didn't help whatsoever, whereas OVH DDoS protection did. But then this topic seems to be more about performance than DDoS protection, so I'll try not to go off-topic. Though if your VPS can't even handle 5Gbps DDoS attack then it doesn't matter how much Disk IO you have as performance will be affected either way and so in that sense OVH would win.
    Web Hosting - Professional Hosting Solutions
    Web Hosting Forum - Web Hosting Community

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    146
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 33 Times in 19 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 150/0
    Given: 61/0
    Quote Originally Posted by HostXNow View Post
    I think OVH SSD VPS 3 plan is really good. Their SSD VPS range is much better compared to their Cloud VPS. Plus OVH offers far better DDoS protection compared to the others, and so the combo of speed & DDoS protection for value for money would go to OVH, IMO.

    I had a VPS with Vultr with their 10Gbps DDoS protected IP which didn't help whatsoever, whereas OVH DDoS protection did. But then this topic seems to be more about performance than DDoS protection, so I'll try not to go off-topic. Though if your VPS can't even handle 5Gbps DDoS attack then it doesn't matter how much Disk IO you have as performance will be affected either way and so in that sense OVH would win.
    maybe someone with OVH SSD VPS3 plan can run these openssl benchmarks for comparison

    Where -multi value is number of cpu threads you server has
    Code:
    openssl speed rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc -multi 2
    openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 2
    openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 2

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    86
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 3/0
    Given: 89/0
    Quote Originally Posted by eva2000 View Post
    have comparative benchmarks but it's against forum rules to link to them (self promotion) and they're long and detailed

    example of one of dozens of benchmark results this is for disk FFIO benchmarks back in August 2015

    Name:  benchmarks1.jpg
Views: 2716
Size:  42.3 KB

    and OpenSSL - of particular interest is for SSL certificates and HTTPS via RSA 2048bit and ECC 256bit ECDSA

    Name:  benchmarks2.jpg
Views: 2740
Size:  84.7 KB

    OVH Public Cloud EG-7 instance from Jan 2016 benchmarks raw disk FFIO in comparison
    Code:
    -------------------------------------------
    disk FIO tests
    -------------------------------------------
    
    FIO random reads:
    randomreads: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    fio-2.0.9
    Starting 1 process
    randomreads: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 1024MB)
    
    randomreads: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=3984: Thu Dec 31 19:49:25 2015
      read : io=1024.3MB, bw=8004.4KB/s, iops=2001 , runt=131033msec
      cpu          : usr=1.82%, sys=6.32%, ctx=246575, majf=0, minf=83
      IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
         submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
         complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
         issued    : total=r=262207/w=0/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
       READ: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=8004KB/s, minb=8004KB/s, maxb=8004KB/s, mint=131033msec, maxt=131033msec
    
    Disk stats (read/write):
      vda: ios=262045/73, merge=0/26, ticks=8374297/371, in_queue=8375702, util=100.00%
    
    FIO random writes:
    randomwrites: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=4K-4K/4K-4K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=64
    fio-2.0.9
    Starting 1 process
    
    randomwrites: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=4002: Thu Dec 31 19:51:41 2015
      write: io=1024.3MB, bw=7727.4KB/s, iops=1931 , runt=135729msec
      cpu          : usr=1.39%, sys=6.26%, ctx=220032, majf=0, minf=18
      IO depths    : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
         submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
         complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.0%
         issued    : total=r=0/w=262207/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
    
    Run status group 0 (all jobs):
      WRITE: io=1024.3MB, aggrb=7727KB/s, minb=7727KB/s, maxb=7727KB/s, mint=135729msec, maxt=135729msec
    
    Disk stats (read/write):
      vda: ios=0/261960, merge=0/0, ticks=0/8649441, in_queue=8650299, util=100.00%
    OpenSSL
    Code:
    -------------------------------------------
    OpenSSL System Benchmark
    -------------------------------------------
    
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    -------------------------------------------
    openssl speed rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc -multi 2
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    built on: Mon Dec 14 05:15:47 UTC 2015
    options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
    md5             119114.20k   346672.32k   764772.86k  1095572.14k  1256876.71k
    sha1            132379.21k   368093.29k   801694.21k  1183186.26k  1474958.68k
    rc4             740271.96k  1300585.32k  1520406.95k  1575287.47k  1582809.09k
    aes-128 cbc     253559.56k   278434.73k   284982.02k   609188.52k   618599.77k
    aes-256 cbc     184280.39k   199743.91k   202872.58k   446723.75k   452149.25k
    sha256          100144.66k   221360.19k   392457.05k   473819.14k   499971.41k
                      sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
    rsa 2048 bits 0.000590s 0.000018s   1695.0  56349.2
    rsa 4096 bits 0.004132s 0.000066s    242.0  15209.3
                                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
    256 bit ecdsa (nistp256)   0.0001s   0.0002s  19419.3   5057.9
    -------------------------------------------
    openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 2
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    built on: Mon Dec 14 05:15:47 UTC 2015
    options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
    evp             957220.09k  1007051.93k  1020813.31k  1024438.27k  1015267.33k
    -------------------------------------------
    openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 2
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    built on: Mon Dec 14 05:15:47 UTC 2015
    options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
    evp            1258757.73k  1356930.77k  1383251.71k  1390031.87k  1394032.64k
    This data may be out of date because they were benchmarks in August 2015, they also don't tell us all aspects of a web hosting companies as support, pricing, hosting control panel, uptime/downtime..etc hence I think your orders might not be exact.

    Quote Originally Posted by eva2000 View Post
    1. Linode
    2. Ramnode
    3. DigitalOcean
    4. Vultr
    5. OVH

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    146
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 33 Times in 19 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 150/0
    Given: 61/0
    Guess it's relative to the end user's criteria and requirements. I don't need much support as I manage all my servers myself 96% centmin mod lemp based and remaining 4% are cpanel/whm based. So my criteria first and foremost is performance to price ratio with Linode being the sweet spot given that 8GB memory + 4 cpus on Intel Xeon E5-2680v2 or E5-2680v3 or E5-2697v4 processor with 96GB fast SSD storage and 4TB bandwidth is US$40/month https://www.linode.com/pricing

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    355
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 147/1
    Given: 99/0
    Quote Originally Posted by eva2000 View Post
    maybe someone with OVH SSD VPS3 plan can run these openssl benchmarks for comparison

    Where -multi value is number of cpu threads you server has
    Code:
    openssl speed rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc -multi 2
    openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 2
    openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 2
    Code:
    [email protected] [~]# openssl speed rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc -multi 2
    Forked child 0
    Forked child 1
    +DT:md5:3:16
    +DT:md5:3:16
    +R:9093144:md5:3.000000
    +R:9060555:md5:3.000000
    +DT:md5:3:64
    +DT:md5:3:64
    +R:6646363:md5:3.000000
    +R:6673289:md5:3.000000
    +DT:md5:3:256
    +DT:md5:3:256
    +R:3607752:md5:3.000000
    +R:3551888:md5:3.000000
    +DT:md5:3:1024
    +DT:md5:3:1024
    +R:1306786:md5:3.000000
    +R:1304321:md5:3.000000
    +DT:md5:3:8192
    +DT:md5:3:8192
    +R:186781:md5:3.000000
    +R:186966:md5:3.000000
    +DT:sha1:3:16
    +DT:sha1:3:16
    +R:10085967:sha1:3.000000
    +R:10130107:sha1:3.000000
    +DT:sha1:3:64
    +DT:sha1:3:64
    +R:6688119:sha1:3.000000
    +DT:sha1:3:256
    +R:6209694:sha1:3.000000
    +DT:sha1:3:256
    +R:3703478:sha1:3.000000
    +R:3601996:sha1:3.000000
    +DT:sha1:3:1024
    +DT:sha1:3:1024
    +R:1389015:sha1:3.000000
    +DT:sha1:3:8192
    +R:1385219:sha1:3.000000
    +DT:sha1:3:8192
    +R:212241:sha1:3.000000
    +DT:sha256:3:16
    +R:209551:sha1:3.000000
    +DT:sha256:3:16
    +R:7586701:sha256:3.000000
    +DT:sha256:3:64
    +R:7583900:sha256:3.000000
    +DT:sha256:3:64
    +R:4260006:sha256:3.000000
    +R:4269472:sha256:3.000000
    +DT:sha256:3:256
    +DT:sha256:3:256
    +R:1840700:sha256:3.000000
    +DT:sha256:3:1024
    +R:1844416:sha256:3.000000
    +DT:sha256:3:1024
    +R:562572:sha256:3.000000
    +DT:sha256:3:8192
    +R:512059:sha256:3.000000
    +DT:sha256:3:8192
    +R:74274:sha256:3.000000
    +DT:rc4:3:16
    +R:72532:sha256:3.000000
    +DT:rc4:3:16
    +R:53677829:rc4:3.000000
    +R:53684347:rc4:3.000000
    +DT:rc4:3:64
    +DT:rc4:3:64
    +R:24476693:rc4:3.000000
    +DT:rc4:3:256
    +R:24618710:rc4:3.000000
    +DT:rc4:3:256
    +R:7214303:rc4:3.000000
    +DT:rc4:3:1024
    +R:7212875:rc4:3.000000
    +DT:rc4:3:1024
    +R:1862555:rc4:3.000000
    +DT:rc4:3:8192
    +R:1855008:rc4:3.000000
    +DT:rc4:3:8192
    +R:234987:rc4:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:16
    +R:234617:rc4:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:16
    +R:19281263:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:64
    +R:19258549:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:64
    +R:5298167:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:256
    +R:5293849:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:256
    +R:1357219:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:1024
    +R:1355862:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:1024
    +R:726105:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:8192
    +R:725274:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128 cbc:3:8192
    +R:92081:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:16
    +R:91538:aes-128 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:16
    +R:14150224:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:64
    +R:14140675:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:64
    +R:3781441:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:256
    +R:3354831:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:256
    +R:966274:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:1024
    +R:948925:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:1024
    +R:529248:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:8192
    +R:518553:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256 cbc:3:8192
    +R:67269:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +R:66935:aes-256 cbc:3.000000
    +DTP:2048:private:rsa:10
    +DTP:2048:private:rsa:10
    +R1:6707:2048:10.00
    +R1:6628:2048:10.00
    +DTP:2048:public:rsa:10
    +DTP:2048:public:rsa:10
    +R2:223032:2048:10.00
    +R2:218568:2048:10.00
    +DTP:4096:private:rsa:10
    +DTP:4096:private:rsa:10
    +R1:902:4096:10.00
    +DTP:4096:public:rsa:10
    +R1:900:4096:10.01
    +DTP:4096:public:rsa:10
    +R2:60475:4096:10.00
    +DTP:256:sign:ecdsa:10
    +R2:61107:4096:10.00
    +DTP:256:sign:ecdsa:10
    +R5:71496:256:10.00
    +DTP:256:verify:ecdsa:10
    +R5:66060:256:10.00
    +DTP:256:verify:ecdsa:10
    +R6:16743:256:10.00
    Got: +H:16:64:256:1024:8192 from 0
    Got: +F:3:md5:48322960.00:142363498.67:303094442.67:445208234.67:510541824.00 from 0
    Got: +F:5:sha1:54027237.33:142679872.00:316030122.67:474117120.00:579559424.00 from 0
    Got: +F:7:rc4:286281754.67:522169450.67:615620522.67:635752106.67:641671168.00 from 0
    Got: +F:16:aes-128 cbc:102833402.67:113027562.67:115816021.33:247843840.00:251442517.33 from 0
    Got: +F:18:aes-256 cbc:75467861.33:80670741.33:82455381.33:180649984.00:183689216.00 from 0
    Got: +F:23:sha256:40462405.33:90880128.00:157073066.67:192024576.00:202817536.00 from 0
    Got: +F2:2:2048:0.001491:0.000045 from 0
    Got: +F2:3:4096:0.011086:0.000165 from 0
    Got: +F4:3:256:0.000140:0.000597 from 0
    +R6:18086:256:10.00
    Got: +H:16:64:256:1024:8192 from 1
    Got: +F:3:md5:48496768.00:141789077.33:307861504.00:446049621.33:510036650.67 from 1
    Got: +F:5:sha1:53791824.00:132473472.00:307370325.33:472821418.67:572213930.67 from 1
    Got: +F:7:rc4:286316517.33:525199146.67:615498666.67:633176064.00:640660821.33 from 1
    Got: +F:16:aes-128 cbc:102712261.33:112935445.33:115700224.00:247560192.00:249959765.33 from 1
    Got: +F:18:aes-256 cbc:75416933.33:71569728.00:80974933.33:176999424.00:182777173.33 from 1
    Got: +F:23:sha256:40447466.67:91082069.33:157390165.33:174782805.33:198060714.67 from 1
    Got: +F2:2:2048:0.001509:0.000046 from 1
    Got: +F2:3:4096:0.011122:0.000164 from 1
    Got: +F4:3:256:0.000151:0.000553 from 1
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    built on: Sun Nov  6 03:45:24 UTC 2016
    options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
    md5              96819.73k   284152.58k   610955.95k   891257.86k  1020578.47k
    sha1            107819.06k   275153.34k   623400.45k   946938.54k  1151773.35k
    rc4             572598.27k  1047368.60k  1231119.19k  1268928.17k  1282331.99k
    aes-128 cbc     205545.66k   225963.01k   231516.25k   495404.03k   501402.28k
    aes-256 cbc     150884.79k   152240.47k   163430.31k   357649.41k   366466.39k
    sha256           80909.87k   181962.20k   314463.23k   366807.38k   400878.25k
                      sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
    rsa 2048 bits 0.000750s 0.000023s   1333.4  43961.4
    rsa 4096 bits 0.005552s 0.000082s    180.1  12158.2
                                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
     256 bit ecdsa (nistp256)   0.0001s   0.0003s  13765.4   3483.4
    [email protected] [~]#
    Code:
    [email protected] [~]# openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 2
    Forked child 0
    Forked child 1
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:16
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:16
    +R:66967987:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:64
    +R:71909762:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:64
    +R:17319546:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:256
    +R:18553577:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:256
    +R:4730655:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:1024
    +R:4781434:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:1024
    +R:1158888:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:8192
    +R:1169718:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-256-cbc:3:8192
    +R:149901:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    +R:151543:aes-256-cbc:3.000000
    Got: +H:16:64:256:1024:8192 from 0
    Got: +F:22:aes-256-cbc:357162597.33:369483648.00:403682560.00:395567104.00:409329664.00 from 0
    Got: +H:16:64:256:1024:8192 from 1
    Got: +F:22:aes-256-cbc:383518730.67:395809642.67:408015701.33:399263744.00:413813418.67 from 1
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    built on: Sun Nov  6 03:45:24 UTC 2016
    options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
    evp             740681.33k   765293.29k   811698.26k   794830.85k   823143.08k
    [email protected] [~]#
    Code:
    [email protected] [~]# openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 2
    Forked child 0
    Forked child 1
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:16
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:16
    +R:96395130:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:64
    +R:96633984:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:64
    +R:26261506:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:256
    +R:26261048:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:256
    +R:6732444:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:1024
    +R:6738525:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:1024
    +R:1695647:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:8192
    +R:1695805:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    +DT:aes-128-cbc:3:8192
    +R:202945:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    +R:205053:aes-128-cbc:3.000000
    Got: +H:16:64:256:1024:8192 from 0
    Got: +F:22:aes-128-cbc:514107360.00:560245461.33:574501888.00:578780842.67:554175146.67 from 0
    Got: +H:16:64:256:1024:8192 from 1
    Got: +F:22:aes-128-cbc:515381248.00:560235690.67:575020800.00:578834773.33:559931392.00 from 1
    OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
    built on: Sun Nov  6 03:45:24 UTC 2016
    options:bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(16x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) idea(int) blowfish(idx)
    compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches   -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
    evp            1029488.61k  1120481.15k  1149522.69k  1157615.62k  1114106.54k
    [email protected] [~]#
    Web Hosting - Professional Hosting Solutions
    Web Hosting Forum - Web Hosting Community

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to HostXNow For This Useful Post:
    eva2000 (01-16-2017)

  24. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Core Files
    Posts
    104
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 87/0
    Given: 104/0
    I'm late for the party since this thread was created last summer.

    Of all the hosts listed, I've only dealt with RamNode, so I can only give my opinion of them, and there service and support is A+.

  25. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    146
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 33 Times in 19 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 150/0
    Given: 61/0
    Quote Originally Posted by HostXNow View Post
    Code:
    [email protected] [~]# openssl speed rsa4096 rsa2048 ecdsap256 sha256 sha1 md5 rc4 aes-256-cbc aes-128-cbc -multi 2
    
    md5              96819.73k   284152.58k   610955.95k   891257.86k  1020578.47k
    sha1            107819.06k   275153.34k   623400.45k   946938.54k  1151773.35k
    rc4             572598.27k  1047368.60k  1231119.19k  1268928.17k  1282331.99k
    aes-128 cbc     205545.66k   225963.01k   231516.25k   495404.03k   501402.28k
    aes-256 cbc     150884.79k   152240.47k   163430.31k   357649.41k   366466.39k
    sha256           80909.87k   181962.20k   314463.23k   366807.38k   400878.25k
                      sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
    rsa 2048 bits 0.000750s 0.000023s   1333.4  43961.4
    rsa 4096 bits 0.005552s 0.000082s    180.1  12158.2
                                  sign    verify    sign/s verify/s
     256 bit ecdsa (nistp256)   0.0001s   0.0003s  13765.4   3483.4
    Code:
    [email protected] [~]# openssl speed -evp aes256 -multi 2
    
    evp             740681.33k   765293.29k   811698.26k   794830.85k   823143.08k
    Code:
    [email protected] [~]# openssl speed -evp aes128 -multi 2
    
    evp            1029488.61k  1120481.15k  1149522.69k  1157615.62k  1114106.54k
    thanks for that - definitely slower than Linode

  26. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    355
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 147/1
    Given: 99/0
    Not when your Linode IP is being DDoS. OVH wins then!?
    Web Hosting - Professional Hosting Solutions
    Web Hosting Forum - Web Hosting Community

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Newer Threads

  1. OnaDavney
    rankmyhub
    Replies: 32 | Views: 4797
    Last post by rankmyhub, 05-03-2017, 02:54 PM
  2. WorkerBee
    .com Domains
    By WorkerBee in forum Domain Names
    TwoPalmsHost
    Replies: 22 | Views: 2240
    Last post by TwoPalmsHost, 05-29-2017, 12:08 PM
  3. WorkerBee
    R Langley
    Replies: 20 | Views: 5169
    Last post by R Langley, 12-25-2016, 07:16 AM
  4. WorkerBee
    Luxin Host
    Replies: 5 | Views: 622
    Last post by Luxin Host, 06-26-2016, 04:00 AM
  5. VirtuBox
    laurence
    Replies: 13 | Views: 3779
    Last post by laurence, 02-06-2017, 03:04 AM

Older Threads

  1. Mihai B.
    Malcolmjr96
    Replies: 3 | Views: 619
    Last post by Malcolmjr96, 06-16-2016, 10:32 AM
  2. Paul Wellner Bou
    Kieranlewix
    Replies: 24 | Views: 5241
    Last post by Kieranlewix, 09-29-2017, 03:04 PM
  3. MrRapidHost
    digitallakshay
    Replies: 7 | Views: 1153
    Last post by digitallakshay, 06-01-2017, 07:10 AM
  4. rfharris
    rfharris
    Replies: 0 | Views: 499
    Last post by rfharris, 06-15-2016, 11:51 AM
  5. BillEssley
    alphavm_net
    Replies: 6 | Views: 1214
    Last post by alphavm_net, 10-06-2016, 06:25 PM

Latest Threads

  1. RackService
    RackService
    Replies: 0 | Views: 1
    Last post by RackService, Today, 11:14 PM
  2. RackService
    RackService
    Replies: 0 | Views: 1
    Last post by RackService, Today, 11:13 PM
  3. RackService
    RackService
    Replies: 0 | Views: 2
    Last post by RackService, Today, 11:13 PM
  4. livsn85
    junrose123
    Replies: 1 | Views: 17
    Last post by junrose123, Today, 09:14 AM
  5. livsn85
    livsn85
    Replies: 0 | Views: 25
    Last post by livsn85, Today, 07:57 AM

Similar Threads

  1. Emilio
    David Makogon
    Replies: 8 | Views: 4697
    Last post by David Makogon, 05-16-2016, 03:16 AM
  2. BillEssley
    MarcS
    Replies: 6 | Views: 3971
    Last post by MarcS, 09-15-2015, 08:07 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Web Hosting Forum

ForumWeb.Hosting is a web hosting forum where you’ll find in-depth discussions and resources to help you find the best hosting providers for your websites or how to manage your hosting whether you are new or experienced. You’ll find it all here. With topics ranging from web hosting, internet marketing, search engine optimization, social networking, make money online, affiliate marketing as well as hands-on technical support for web design, programming and more. We are a growing community of like-minded people that is keen to help and support each other with ambitions and online endeavors. Learn and grow, make friends and contacts for life.

Community

The world's smartest hosting providers come here to discuss & share what's trending in the web hosting world!
Copyright ©2017, ForumWeb.Hosting. All rights reserved. Web Hosting Forum for webmasters, web hosting providers, designers and web developers.

Welcome to Forum Web Hosting

The World's Number 1 Web Hosting Community, Reviews & Services

Log in!

Continue with Facebook
Continue With Email. By signing up you indicate that you have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Sign in Manually

Need an account? Sign up now!